Trade within South
Asia could be a catalyst for peace which can enhance bilateral relations,
increase economic growth and reduce poverty in the region, said Khurram Dastgir
Khan, MNA PMLN while speaking at the 2nd day of 15th Annual Sustainable
Development Conference (SDC), organized by Sustainable Development Policy
Institute (SDPI) here on Wednesday. The three-day conference titled
“Sustainable Development in South Asia: Shaping the Future” is looking at
future of sustainable development in South Asia. Delegates from South
Asian countries as well as from 15 other countries around the world are
participating in the conference.
Khurram Dastgir Khan
was chairing the session on “Non-Tariff Barriers in Indo-Pak trade” and elaborated
upon how the trade between India and Pakistan presents immense gains for
consumers and how trade could be used as a catalyst for solving issues such as
political disputes. However, Dastgir made it clear that important issues should
also be brought to the table while negotiating on trade relations, such as the
issue of India’s heavily subsidized sector and possibility of India granting a
sovereign guarantee to Pakistani investors while investing in the Indian
market. Earlier, Saad Rajput from SDPI presented his talk which touched upon
the issues of Indian quality standards, non-transparent custom valuation of
goods, complex tariff structures and the lack of infrastructural and transport
protocols. Ali Khizar from Business Recorder mentioned how the China-Taiwan
and China-Japan example should be followed, in which trade paved the way for
solving political issues. Muhammad Adnan from SDPI mentioned the set of
proposals drafted by Asian Development Bank and the SAARC chamber of commerce
and industry. He identified that the main problem of businessmen on both sides
was the absence of proper infrastructure. Dr. Sohail Safdar, DG Trade and
Policy identified South Asian region as a homogenous region. Dr. Pervez Tahir,
former chief economist said that Pakistan and India are two very different
economies, and this fact needs to be realized before formulating trade policies
between the two countries.
The session on “Role
of public infrastructure in reshaping Asia’s future” discussed the importance
of infrastructure in initiating economic growth. Dr. Vaqar Ahmed from SDPI
underlined the need for state-market relationship, as continuously evolved by
China and India. Dr. Yumei Zhang, from Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences
expressed that over the period of last 30 years, infrastructures in China have
significantly improved which contributed to the fastest economic growth rate of
10%. Dr. Nadia Tahir expressed that privatization is not the solution for
railways in Pakistan. She said that Indian railway is technically efficient by
using marketing strategy of capacity utilization, reduction in unit costs, and
improvement in service quality. Citing Chinese and Indian Railways she said,
“The lesson drawn for Pakistan is that technical efficiency leads to other
efficiencies and railway can be sustained by steady public investment and
autonomous and professional management”. Naveed Iftikhar from Ministry of
Finance informed that government has developed a revitalization strategy for railways.
The session on
“Promoting Sustainable Enterprises in South Asia”, analyzed the role of
Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) for ensuring sustainability of
enterprises in South Asia. Anam Khan from SDPI informed participants that SDPI
is representing Pakistan in SANSAR network which aims to improve both supply
and value chains within enterprises and promote CSR activities across South
Asia. Pramod John from India expressed that inclusion of CSR activities within
the enterprises will not only increase their yield, as was the case in Sugar
Industry in India, but also promote sustainable development. He further added
that now a debate is going in India to make it mandatory for companies to
invest 2% of their profit in CSR activities. Mochan Bhattarai from (ECCA) Nepal
elaborated that political instability in Nepal, like many other South Asian
countries, is the biggest challenge in undertaking CSR initiatives. The chair
concluded the session with the view that there is a need to create awareness
among masses about strategic CSR to get desired results.
During the session on
“social and livelihood implications of conflict situation” Stephen Commins from
USA said that violent conflicts disrupt livelihood and markets, and this makes
the people vulnerable to hunger and malnourishment. He underlined the need to
focus on restoring markets, establishment of infrastructure, and revival of
supply chain and market mechanism. Qasim Shah of SDPI, expressed that
government and donors should focus on markets through which the livelihood
issues can be resolved. Dr. Bishnu Upreti from (NCCR) Nepal, stressed on
enhancing investment and developing local ownership in the livelihood sector.
Dr. Babar Shahbaz, from University of Agriculture, cited his research work in
KP and said that high food prices, low crop productivity and malfunctioning of
social safety nets is a common concern for deteriorated livelihood conditions
in the province. Mr. Geoff Woods of Bath University UK, commented on dire need
to attach security perspective to the development work.
At
the session on “social movements for empowerment of poor” Karamat Ali, from
PILER discussed that marginalized people in Pakistan can be empowerment through
a healthy political process and transformation of institutional structure. Prof
Geof wood of Bath University UK said “There is a need for continual reform
structure in favor of equitable distribution of resources. Along with this,
there is a need to also strengthen the market structure”. Awanish Kumar
from India explained that in some places, the marginalized people even do not
have the right to change their profession. Due to this inclusive exploitation,
people are deprived from community resources. Dr. Urs Geiser, Senior Researcher
from Switzerland believed that the social movements can be addressed in a better
way by a collective effort from potential stake holders in society.
|