Media Coverage

Letters What is the difference between a patriot and a subversive?
The Friday Times Vol. XXVI, No. 22, Issue: July 11-17, 2014
Friday, 11th Jul 2014
Lahore
Haider Abbas

Pakistan's existing policy frameworks contain a number of exceptional goals and objectives, including an improved quality of education, the elimination of all types of disparities imbalances, and significantly improved enrolment rates. However in current policy structure, Pakistan is long away from achieving this vision.

The vision document has positioned human resource development at the top of national agenda by capitalizing on existing social capital, strengthening it and improving the human skill base of the population to optimally contribute to and effectively benefit from economic growth.

But unfortunately, like previous budgets, an analysis of current year federal budget reveals how the wellbeing of citizens has been ignored by allocating more than 18 percent of national budget to defense. Even in today’s world of knowledge based societies our allocation for health and education are shamefully lowest in the region.

According to federal budget document 2014-15, the education and health sectors have once again failed to receive their due share in the present budget. An amount of Rs 74.031 billion has been allocated to both sectors registering an increase of only 1.5 percent as compared to the previous year which pales into insignificance if population growth and inflation hovering around 9 percent are adjusted.

Of total amount of Rs 74 billion, a paltry sum earmarked for education, only 13.5 percent goes to the health sector indicating the authorities’ myopic vision of reforming health sector.

In addition to this, the financial bill for the year 2014-15 has once again shattered hopes and dreams of the poor. This bill consists of ambitious development schemes such as metro buses services, metro trains, and motorway from Karachi to Lahore. The dilemma of the government is the result of poor planning, inaccurate distribution of funds, for instance, the building of metro buses rather than hospitals and schools.

In the PSDP for 2014-15 major investment is envisaged in energy sector, followed by transport and communications. Out of total 1175 billion, only 12.5 billion have allocated for achievement of Millennium Development Goals (MGDs).

While on the other hand, under pillar one of Vision 2025 government promises that a larger share of the GDP, at least 4pc to education and at least 3pc to health, would have to be allotted to achieve universal primary education with 100pc net primary enrolment, increase higher education coverage from 7pc to 12pc and increase proportion of population with access to improved sanitation from 38pc to 90pc.

Looking into all these facts, the current resource allocations by government do not shows any political will to priorities human development to achieve the goals and objectives of Vision 2025. In its current shape Pakistan is the embodiment of a security state where human development barely attracts attention.

On the whole, the budget is far from ‘poor-friendly’ and presents claims completely divorced from reality. The myth of macro-stabilization and its consequent trickle-down affects has shattered and the lot of the poor has not changed. The misplaced priorities coupled with shotgun approach to allocations will worsen the economic crisis confronting the country in coming years.

At this critical juncture Government of Pakistan needs to stabilize the economy, rebuild severally eroded credibility, close the fiscal deficit, re-establish confidence in public institutions and improve the investment climate. In parallel with its macroeconomic stabilization program the government needs to develop a comprehensive program of structural reforms as a part of vision 2025.

Pakistan must respond to such challenges effectively, since all nations now aspire to become knowledge economies. This calls for change in mindset incorporating a quest for excellence, so that Pakistan can redefine and transform its institutions and structures of the state, as well as national policies, strategic priorities and long term bench marks within the overarching for Pakistan in 2025.

Source: http://www.thefridaytimes.com/tft/letters-21/