Media Coverage

The better option
The News
Sunday, 13th May 2012
Islamabad
Fareeha Mehmood

The present energy crisis in Pakistan is worsening day by day due to a strange energy mix, increased reliance on costly oil imports, lack of proactive approach and ignorance of sustainable options in energy corridors of Pakistan.
High dependency on fossil fuel for electricity generation has drained the national exchequer, whereas a mounting import bill continues to exert pressure on the trade deficit and the foreign exchange reserves. The economic growth of Pakistan has suffered a serious setback coupled with substantial decrease in GDP, unemployment and civil distress hovering over the nation’s security like devastating disaster.
In order to eliminate power crisis and to avoid this disaster, the energy-starved country is now looking forward to import electricity from its neighbours, ignoring the sustainable alternative once again and given the associated economic benefits of local job creation and economic activities arising out of these projects.
This energy crisis would not have transformed into such a gruesome condition if the substantial contribution would have been made by Renewable Energy Resources towards the national grid. But, unfortunately, the thermal explosion due to IPPs inclusion in response to 1994 Power Policy and Rental Power Plant projects approved by NEPRA in 2009-10 exacerbated the crisis and diverted the attention towards the cheap, clean and safe renewable resources.
This was a major setback for hydropower development in the country as it came amidst almost ecstatic fervour that characterised the prevalent crisis situation. The responsibility also lies with Alternative Energy Development Board (AEDB) as its prime role was to promote the renewable energy resources and advocate them rightly. Also, the regulatory authority, NEPRA has so far failed entirely in facilitating the government to bring forth successful reforms in power sector and in providing adequate advice and guidance in right direction.
Currently, Pakistan is importing 70MW for the coastal city of Makran from Iran at the average price of Rs7/unit. The preparations are also going on for import of 100MW to Gawadar from Tehran within a few months and 1000MW Iranian electricity within a few years, taking the total project cost of $694 million, thus costing Pakistan a huge sum of $440 million for laying transmission lines.
Additionally, in the purview of resolving electricity crisis, the country is also looking towards India to import 500 MW of electricity from Amritsar to Lahore. The two countries have decided to build a 220 kV line of 45 km within six months of the signing of a formal agreement on the proposal. The agreement will be valid for five years and negotiable for another five years or more. The average price of energy delivered to Pakistan is estimated at Rs16/unit.
The question here is: would import of electricity from India and Iran be able to make for the shortfall of 6000-7000MW persisting at present? Also, the import of electricity from neighbouring countries would definitely subject to new challenges because Pakistani banks are reluctant to open Letter of Credit for Iran due to sanctions imposed by the West. In case of India, construction of dams on Western rivers breaches the Indus Water Treaty. Is this a wise decision to spend $300-400 million on laying the transmission line for importing electricity from India at a high cost per unit? Wouldn’t this decision make the already delayed hydro power projects to suffer a setback again?
It is also pertinent to mention here that the shortfall is ascribed to the poor condition and ‘performance’ of the power plants. The power generation system within the country could be made to cater this increasing demand given the potential of efficiency improvement and benchmarking the fuel efficiency of the plants with international standards.
Unfortunately, neither the government of Pakistan has given directions nor has National Electric Power Regulatory Authority (NEPRA) taken any initiative to improve efficiency of the thermal power plants, thereby exacerbating the prevalent deteriorating condition and leading to unleashing electricity shortfall.
Pakistan, along with Afghanistan, Kyrgyz Republic and Tajikistan, is also working on the development of electricity trade through Central South Asia Regional Electricity Market (CASAREM). A Cross border transmission line project named as Central Asia South Asia Electricity Trade and Transmission Project (CASA)-1000 has been proposed for the construction of dedicated link for supplying 3000 MW of surplus hydro power available during summer from the Kyrgyz Republic and Tajikistan to Pakistan through Afghanistan at the cost of US$ 873m, expected to be completed in 2016.
The decision once again overlooked the potential of hydro power projects in the country and associated benefits with their timely completion. The projects, which are ready for construction, include Bhasha Dam (4600 MW), Dasu (3000 MW), and Bunji (7000 MW), with an average cost of Rs1-2/unit, if completed as per announced operational date.
These projects being labour-intensive would involve the local unskilled labour and promote the domestic use of construction material and associated engineering services and goods, thus outweighing the import options.
The writer is a researcher.