|
The paper
articulates findings of an autoethnographic research study by three Pakistani
self-identified feminist activists who were born in the Zia-ul-Haq era (1980s).
All three have spent the last ten years working as feminist activists in
Pakistan. The focus of their inquiry is on feminist identity construction in
the contemporary context of Pakistan amongst their own generation. Using a
transnational feminist analytical lens, the authors draw on their experiences,
observations and discourse, exploring multifaceted identities and choices as
Pakistanis and as feminists analyzed through narratives. Challenging the
boundaries of research and researcher, the study involves overt critical
subjectivity as their narratives are deconstructed. Exploring the emerging
feminist perspectives as well as the social transformation of thought, ideology
and practices, the collective analysis suggests that the last decade’s
complexity of social and geopolitical circumstances and the multitude of actors
projecting their mutated versions of feminism and empowerment are key
contributing factors to the current situation.
The study also asserts that although 9/11 left an indelible mark on the
course of events in Pakistan it cannot be seen, nor must it be built up as the
only defining moment of the decade. 9/11 was only one such manifestation which
re-fuelled the perennial debate between the orient and the occident; the subject
and other. Their analysis demonstrates that forces of Imperialism morph and
reappear in different guises making the path for activism murky and fraught
with challenges very different from what feminists in the generation before
them had to encounter. In Pakistan today, feminist
ideological analysis and debates seem to have fewer spaces for discussions and
visibility. Feminists today, stand cautious and
threatened by increasing intolerance amid fears of accusations of being
pro-west. The study concludes that a paradigmatic
shift is required by feminists of their generation if they are to assume
leadership positions in the movement. This shift requires being self-critical
and conscious of the choices they make both at a theoretical and at a pragmatic
level.
|