|
On 18th May 2009, the prolonged conflict
in Sri Lanka between the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (LTTE) and the
Government of Sri Lanka (GOSL) came to an end. It triggered a massive
humanitarian crisis and Sri Lanka came under international condemnation for its
handling of the crisis. In addition
since the end of the conflict, there has been sustained international pressure
to address key issues concerning minorities through a constitutional framework
that will satisfy the aspirations of all its citizens. In particular,
reconciliation between increasingly suspicious and polarised communities is the
need of the hour to ensure an environment of peace, justice and equity through
the medium of good governance. A country
that has before prided itself on its religious diversity and freedom for the
practice of religion is facing an unexpected post conflict future.
The 28-year-old conflict succeeded in extenuating cracks between different ethnic groups along
faith lines, such that identity was
strengthened by religious affiliation and the ‘other’ became not only someone
of a different ethnicity but someone of a different religion. The result is that conflicts manifested themselves
into rumour, hearsay and generalisation which are the first steps towards
stereotyping of people (their faith, culture and identity) and the denial of a
diverse, lived reality, the opposite of respect, understanding and acceptance.
As a consequence, faiths (beliefs, culture and identity) became judged by the
attitudes and actions of small and aberrant minorities.
This insecurity of identity has been felt on all
sides, but the Sinhala Buddhist, who form majority of the population, exhibit
the most extreme of strains and currently in an absence of a conflict, are
beginning to exert this religious based ethnic identity, thereby, posing the
greatest threat to religious freedoms in Sri Lanka. This particular strand of
Buddhism has undergone a massive change and reinterpretation of its doctrines
as a result of the conflict, becoming more militant, violent and ultimately
intolerant largely led by the clergy. In
particular, there seems to be an emerging clash with Islam as shown by recent
incidents in Sri Lanka, with the destruction of mosques which could also have
regional implications for South Asia.
Sri Lankan Buddhism has historically been very
strongly linked with Buddhism in Myanmar with both countries sharing the same
ideologies. Whilst there is no tangible evidence linking Sri Lankan Buddhism to
the recent clashes between Buddhists and Muslims in Myanmar, it is clear that
monks in Myanmar are heavily influenced by the clergy of Sri Lanka. Thus, any change of ideological thinking
amongst the former will relate to thinking amongst the latter.
Whilst not all monks
and Buddhists are guilty of this intolerance, it is up to the Government,
regional bodies and organisations to have an honest dialogue with each other
and identify root causes for the fractures to take place. This paper will
explore some of the challenges faced and identify some key recommendations.
|