|
Public
infrastructure has remained largely dominated by the government’s footprint.
Public Sector Enterprises (PSEs) were created to cater to the needs of
community service obligations and sometimes sectors where large investments
were required. PSEs have played a pivotal role in bridging the gap of private
sector investment in strategic sectors of the economy namely transport,
communication, public utilities including energy, heavy industries, banking
& finance and food & agriculture.
However,
it has now been realised widely that PSEs have created market distortions,
suppressed entrepreneurship and innovation culture and exerted fiscal pressure
on the public exchequer. Service delivery of PSEs has deteriorated due to
multiple factors and they tend to underperform compared to their private sector
counterparts. In several countries, government ownership has resulted in
lowering productivity, distorting competition and poor service delivery. A
number of countries responded by reforming or privatising PSEs, but they still
continue to play a significant role in developing economies, including
Pakistan.
Performance of a number of PSEs operating in
infrastructural areas has deteriorated over time. Functioning of PSEs in
Pakistan has affected not only the economy in terms of hemorrhaging public
exchequer, but impaired lives of people on a daily basis, be it electricity and
gas in the house or a train ride. Considering the need for reform of PSEs,
Government of Pakistan has initiated restructuring of PSEs including Pakistan
Railways and Power Sector.
Key
objectives of the restructuring process include (i) “improve overall corporate governance of
PSEs; (ii) curtail hemorrhaging; (iii) improve service delivery; (iv) reduce
fiscal burden on the exchequer and (v) move to a structural surplus and
increased public sector savings. Key aspects of restructuring model are as follows; (i) restructure Boards
of Directors (BODs) of PSEs by inducting a mix of skills including academia,
management experts, professional managers and technocrats; (ii) induct professional management including
CEOs, CFOs and key mangers; (iii)
develop viable turn around plans; (iv)
ensure implementation of plans in an independent manner with the support
of government under the mandate of Cabinet Committee of Restructuring (CCOR)
and; (v) ensure monitoring by CCOR” (Finance Division n.d.) Substantial progress has
been achieved in this regard (Ibid.).
Quality of infrastructure both in terms of physical
adequacy and service delivery has retarded growth and widened trust deficit
between state and people. Going forward, there is a need to build consensus on
future of PSEs in Pakistan. There is an urgent need to encourage private
investments in key sectors including power and railways. In order to spur growth
in Pakistan, a medium to long term vision needs to be pursued for financial
viability, regulatory oversight and service delivery in these sectors.
Reference:
Finance Division n.d., ‘Year Book 2010-2011’,
Government of Pakistan,
< http://www.finance.gov.pk/publications/YearBook2010_11.pdf>
accessed 29 Nov. 2012.
|