|
This article attempts
to understand the process of social exclusion and power relation in a conflict
area while focusing on access to land resource and livelihood. Land being one
of the productive and livelihood assets in an agrarian society, political
economy of land is complex and it has implication on livelihood, power relation
and social conflict. Exclusion from resources can be understood through the natural
monopoly (the absolute scarcity of land in nature) and the social
monopoly (the relative scarcity of land, it is also known as social
distribution of land) (Shrestha 2001). The fundamental reason is the question
of privileged and non-privileged. Privileged group in terms of class, caste and
gender have higher say and voice and therefore can influence the non-privileged
groups (Shahbaz 2009; Shahbaz et al. 2010). Accordingly, they maintain hegemony
and status quo in unequal agrarian structure. Their livelihood shocks and
stress (livelihood insecurity) and inequity/injustice are historically
institutionalised and regulated in an agrarian society (Seddon & Hussein
2002).
With the help of
empirical research results generated from PhD research 'Landlessness,
Livelihood Insecurity and Social Conflict in Far Western Region of Nepal' (Nepali
2011), this study aims to identify social categories (caste, class and gender)
which either have access to land resource or not. It also aims to find out
process (mechanism) and underlying causes of exclusion especially from the land
resources. After identifying social categories, how these groups interact and
mutually influence/reinforce each other in an agrarian society. This analysis
of power relation was performed through the structural and institutional
perspective (North 1990, 2005; Scoones 1998, 2009). Hence, this paper aims to
analyse exclusion in relation with power and resource in Nepal.
References:
Nepali, P.B. 2011, ‘Landlessness, Livelihoood Insecurity and Social Conflict in
Far Western Region of Nepal’, Ph.D. Dissertation, Human and Natural Resources
Studies Centre (HNRSC,), Kathmandu University and Swiss National Centre of
Competence in Research (NCCR) North-South, Kathmandu, Nepal.
North, D.C. 1990, Institutions, institutional change and economic
performance, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
North, D.C. 2005, Understanding the process of institutional change,
Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey, US.
Scoones, I. 1998, ‘Sustainable rural livelihoods: A framework for analysis’,
IDS Working Paper 72, Brighton, UK.
Scoones, I. 2009, ‘Livelihood Perspectives and Rural Development’, Journal
of Peasant Studies vol. 36, no.1.
Seddon, D. & Hussein, K. 2002, The Consequences of conflict: Livelihoods
and development in Nepal: ODI Working Paper 185, Overseas Development
Institute, London.
Shahbaz, B. 2009, Dilemmas in participatory forest management in Northwest
Pakistan: A livelihood perspective, vol.25, University of Zurich,
Switzerland.
Shahbaz, B. Vinod, C. P. Geiser, U. Sadaf, T. Schärer, L. &
Müller-Böker, U. 2010, ‘Access to livelihood assets: Insights from South Asia
on how institutions work’ in: Hurni, H. & Wiesmann, U. (eds.), Global
Change and Sustainable Development: A Synthesis of Regional Experiences from
Research Partnerships. Perspectives of the Swiss National Centre of Competence
in Research (NCCR) North-South, vol. 5, pp. 283-297, Geographica Bernensia,
University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Shrestha, N. R. 2001, ‘The political economy of land, landlessness and
migration in Nepal’, Nirala Publication, New Delhi, India.`
|